Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 64 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Finnegan v. Leu.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Finnegan v. Leu Anchor | green | “does not restrict the freedom of an elected union leader to choose a staff whose views are compatible with his own.” | 25 |
| 2 | Finnegan v. Leu | green | “the ability of an elected union president to select his own administrators is an integral part of ensuring a union administration's responsiveness to the mandate of the union election.” | 25 |
| 3 | Schonfeld v. Penza | green | “part of a purposeful and deliberate attempt ... to suppress dissent within the union,” | 11 |
| 4 | Cehaich v. International Union, United Automobile Workers | green | “whether the employee can correctly be considered an instrumental part of the union administration” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.