Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 64 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fox v. Grayson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fox v. Grayson Anchor | green | “since a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted is a pure question of law, a reviewing court owes no deference to a trial court's determination; instead, an appellate court reviews the issue de novo.” | 46 |
| 2 | Fox v. Grayson | green | “a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted 'admits as true the material facts of the complaint.” | 10 |
| 3 | James v. Wilson | green | “if the facts alleged in the complaint can be proved, would the plaintiff be entitled to relief?” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.