Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 64 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from González Hernández v. González Hernández.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | González Hernández v. González Hernández Anchor | green | “el tribunal apelativo tendrá la facultad para adoptar su propio criterio en la apreciación y evaluación de la prueba pericial, y hasta para descartarla, aunque resulte técnicamente correcta” | 36 |
| 2 | Torres Rivera v. Policía de Puerto Rico | green | “(1) erró al aplicar la ley; (2) actuó arbitraria, irrazonable o ilegalmente, o (3) lesionó derechos constitucionales fundamentales” | 28 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.