Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 63 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from AEP Energy Services Gas Holding Co. v. Bank of America, N.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AEP Energy Services Gas Holding Co. v. Bank of America, N.A. Anchor | green | “leave to amend may be denied on grounds of futility if the proposed amendment fails to state a legally cognizable claim or fails to raise triable issues of fact.” | 46 |
| 2 | Agerbrink v. Model Service LLC | green | “to determine whether a proposed pleading is futile, courts analyze whether it would withstand a motion to dismiss.” | 12 |
| 3 | Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Morgan Stanley & Co. | green | “whether the amendment will require the opposing party to expend significant resources in discovery and whether resolution of the dispute will be delayed.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.