Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 62 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jones v. Sparks.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones v. Sparks Anchor | green | “(1) benefit conferred upon defendant at plaintiff's expense; (2) a resulting appreciation of benefit by defendant; and (3) inequitable retention of benefit without payment for its value.” | 29 |
| 2 | St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Barry | green | “the generic concept of boycott refers to a method of pressuring a party with whom one has a dispute by withholding, or enlisting others to withhold, patronage or services from the target.” | 13 |
| 3 | Lamorte Burns & Co., Inc. v. Walters | green | “to prove its claim, plaintiff must show that it had a reasonable expectation of economic advantage that was lost as a direct result of defendants' malicious interference, and that it suffered losses thereby.” | 8 |
| 4 | Williamson Oil Company, Inc. v. Philip Morris USA | green | “to evaluate the evidence proffered by the plaintiffs not to ascertain its credibility, but instead to determine whether that evidence, if credited, 'tends to' establish a conspiracy more than it indicates conscious parallelism.” | 5 |
| 5 | R. M. Harrison Mechanical Corp. v. Decker Industries, Inc. | green | “the circumstances of the acceptance or retention of the benefit must render it inequitable for the defendant not to compensate the plaintiff.” | 4 |
| 6 | Michael Nadalin v. Automobile Recovery Bureau, Inc. | green | “better that the plaintiff should negotiate with the defendant rather than thrusting on the court the difficult task of constructing a hypothetical bargain.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.