Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 61 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Marilyn Kay Kelley.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Marilyn Kay Kelley Anchor | green | “not regarded with favor and should only be granted with great caution.” | 20 |
| 2 | White v. Conoco | green | “the party seeking to set aside a jury verdict must demonstrate trial error which constitutes prejudicial error or that the verdict is not based on substantial evidence.” | 18 |
| 3 | Brian K. Black v. Hieb's Enterprises, Inc. | green | “inquiry focuses on whether the verdict is clearly, decidedly or overwhelmingly against the weight of the evidence.” | 15 |
| 4 | Lucas v. Dover Corp. | green | “judgment n.o.v. should be cautiously and sparingly granted.” | 5 |
| 5 | 51 Fair empl.prac.cas. 669, 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,489 Carl Jackson, Cross v. City of Albuquerque, Orlando Sedillo, and Kiki Saavedra, Cross | green | “may be granted only when, without weighing the credibility of the evidence, there can be but one reasonable conclusion as to the proper judgment.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.