Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 59 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. Anchor | green | “material means that a contested fact has the potential to change the outcome of the suit under the governing law if the dispute over it is resolved favorable to the nonmovant.” | 24 |
| 2 | The International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Winship Green Nursing Center | green | “a dispute is genuine if the parties' positions on the issue are supported by conflicting evidence.” | 14 |
| 3 | Debra Horta v. Charles B. Sullivan | green | “in addition, a court may take into account any material that would be admissible or usable at trial ... but inadmissible evidence may not be considered.” | 11 |
| 4 | Triangle Trading Co. v. Robroy Industries, Inc. | green | “a reasonable jury, drawing favorable inferences, could resolve it in favor of the nonmoving party.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.