Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 58 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mulvihill v. Top-Flite Golf Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mulvihill v. Top-Flite Golf Co. Anchor | green | “court must scrutinize the record in the light most flattering to the party opposing the motion, indulging all reasonable inferences in that party's favor.” | 23 |
| 2 | Meuser v. Federal Express Corp. | green | “once the moving party avers an absence of evidence to support the non-moving party's case, the non-moving party must offer 'definite, competent evidence to rebut the motion.” | 21 |
| 3 | Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Unión Independiente De La Autoridad De Acueductos Y Alcantarillados | green | “the party moving for summary judgment bears the burden of proof on an issue, he cannot prevail unless the evidence that he provides on that issue is conclusive.” | 11 |
| 4 | Figlioli v. R.J. Moreau Companies | green | “to present evidence of wanton, malicious or oppressive conduct.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.