Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 59 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People of Michigan v. Stanley G Duncan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People of Michigan v. Stanley G Duncan Anchor | green | “the decision whether to admit evidence falls within a trial court's discretion and will be reversed only when there is an abuse of that discretion.” | 26 |
| 2 | People v. Jackson | green | “a trial court abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law in the interpretation of a rule of evidence.” | 25 |
| 3 | People v. Jackson | green | “we review such questions of law de novo.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.