Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 57 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Christopher James Murphy v. Mark Kellar.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Christopher James Murphy v. Mark Kellar Anchor | green | “a plaintiff bringing a section 1983 action must specify the personal involvement of each defendant” | 26 |
| 2 | Fernando Jacquez v. R.K. Procunier | green | “in order to successfully plead a cause of action in 1983 cases, plaintiffs must enunciate a set of facts that illustrate the defendants' participation in the wrong alleged” | 16 |
| 3 | Troy Lee Douthit v. Clarence Jones, Sheriff, Dallas County, Texas, and W. H. McCallum | green | “was personally involved in the acts causing the deprivation of his constitutional rights or a causal connection exists between an act of the official and the alleged constitutional violation.” | 15 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.