Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 canonical passages across 9 cases, quoted by 480 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gail Martin v. Andrew M. Saul.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gail Martin v. Andrew M. Saul Anchor | green | “if the alj based the denial of benefits on incorrect legal standards or less than substantial evidence.” | 93 |
| 2 | Christopher Jozefyk v. Nancy Berryhill | green | “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 85 |
| 3 | Norbert J. Skarbek v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart | green | “may not re-weigh the evidence or substitute its judgment for that of the alj.” | 84 |
| 4 | Allord v. Astrue | green | “judicial review of administration decisions under the social security act is governed by 42 u.s.c. 405 (g).” | 76 |
| 5 | Kenneth Scheck v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security | green | “even if an alternative position is also supported by substantial evidence.” | 42 |
| 6 | Brown v. Barnhart | green | “fails to comply with the commissioner's regulations and rulings.” | 41 |
| 7 | Margaret Cullinan v. Nancy Berryhill | green | “will overturn an alj's decision to discredit a claimant's alleged symptoms only if the decision is 'patently wrong,' meaning it lacks explanation or support.” | 35 |
| 8 | Larson v. Astrue | green | “if, after examining the alj's reasons for discrediting testimony, we conclude that the finding is patently wrong.” | 13 |
| 9 | Luster v. Astrue | green | “the most patently erroneous reasons for discounting a treating physician's assessment” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.