Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 55 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Dieter.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Dieter Anchor | green | “giving district courts the opportunity promptly to correct their own alleged errors” | 19 |
| 2 | Pepsico, Inc., and Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Honorable Thomas R. McMillen Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois | green | “whenever there is 'a reasonable basis' for a finding of an 'appearance of partiality under the facts and circumstances' of the case.” | 8 |
| 3 | United States v. Joseph A. Kraus | green | “excluding the judge from the plea discussions thus serves three purposes: it minimizes the risk that the defendant will be judicially coerced into pleading guilty, it preserves the impartiality of the court, and it avoids any appearance of impropriety.” | 8 |
| 4 | United States v. Frank Peter Balistrieri, Steve Disalvo, and Dennis Librizzi, Defendants | red | “directed against the appearance of partiality, whether or not the judge is actually biased.” | 7 |
| 5 | United States v. James O'Neill | green | “no one can be convicted of a crime without the concurrence of all three branches.” | 5 |
| 6 | United States v. Salahuddin | green | “incongruous to permit a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea and go to trial while not permitting him to litigate the admissibility of significant evidence.” | 5 |
| 7 | United States v. Dwayne E. Head (90-3288), Edward A. Black (90-3442), Tony F. Swanson (90-3467), Jacob Stewart (90-3480) | green | “with directions to afford a full opportunity to defendant to address those parts of the sentencing” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.