Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 55 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alameda County Social Services Agency v. A.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alameda County Social Services Agency v. A.A. Anchor | green | “the critical factor in considering whether a dependency appeal is moot is whether the appellate court can provide any effective relief if it finds reversible error” | 43 |
| 2 | Heidi S. v. David H. | green | “the exit order 'shall be a final judgment and shall remain in effect after the juvenile court's jurisdiction is terminated” | 7 |
| 3 | Heidi S. v. David H. | green | “any custody or visitation order issued by the juvenile court at the time the juvenile court terminates its jurisdiction . . . shall be a final judgment and shall remain in effect after that jurisdiction is terminated.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.