Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 456 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories Anchor | green | “when portions of the transcript necessary for resolution of assigned errors are omitted from the record, the reviewing court has nothing to pass upon and thus, as to those assigned errors, the court has no choice but to presume the validity of the lower court's proceedings, and …” | 398 |
| 2 | Morgan v. Eads | green | “a bedrock principle of appellate practice in ohio is that an appeals court is limited to the record of the proceedings at trial.” | 40 |
| 3 | Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories | green | “the duty to provide a transcript for appellate review falls upon the appellant.” | 12 |
| 4 | J. Griffin Ricker Assocs., L.L.C. v. Well | green | “the lack of the transcript independently supported overruling” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.