Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 51 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer Anchor | red | “only remand orders issued under 1447(c) and invoking the grounds specified therein ... are immune from review under 1447(d).” | 45 |
| 2 | In Re Allied-Signal, Inc. And Allied Corporation | green | “the threshold question that confronts us is whether we have jurisdiction to consider the petition.” | 3 |
| 3 | In re Shell Oil Co. | green | “remand orders for lack of subject matter jurisdiction are the only clearly unreviewable remand orders.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.