Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 51 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carlos Gonzalez v. Cynthia J. O'connell, District Director, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and United States of America.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carlos Gonzalez v. Cynthia J. O'connell, District Director, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and United States of America Anchor | green | “exhaustion of administrative remedies is not statutorily mandated,” | 23 |
| 2 | K.C. v. Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Board | green | “courts should avoid resolving cases on constitutional grounds when they can be fairly resolved on statutory grounds.” | 17 |
| 3 | Petar Mojsilovic, Anka Mojsilovic, Jelena Mojsilovic v. Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “although due process claims do not usually require exhaustion because the bia cannot adjudicate constitutional issues, the requirement applies when the petitioner's claim involves procedural errors correctable by the administrative tribunal.” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.