3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 212 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Charles Mack v. Warden Loretto FCI.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charles Mack v. Warden Loretto FCI Anchor | green | “oral grievance to regarding the anti-muslim harassment he endured at work constitutes protected activity under the first amendment.” | 110 |
| 2 | Alex Pearson, Cross-Appellee v. George C. Welborn, Warden and Kristen Kwasniewski | green | “e decline to hold that legitimate complaints lose their protected status simply because they are spoken.” | 76 |
| 3 | David J. Scott v. Patrick Churchill, Inspector, Carson City Regional Facility, Philip Bair | green | “he mere potential threat of disciplinary sanctions is sufficiently adverse action to support a claim of retaliation.” | 26 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.