Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 433 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United States Anchor | green | “in determining jurisdiction, a court must accept as true all undisputed facts asserted in the plaintiff's complaint and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff.” | 286 |
| 2 | Gerald Alan Brown, and Charles v. Darnell v. United States | green | “the court of federal claims is a court of limited jurisdiction.” | 51 |
| 3 | Spengler v. United States | green | “although a pro se plaintiff's complaint is held to a less stringent standard than those prepared by counsel, pro se litigants are not excused from meeting jurisdictional requirements.” | 30 |
| 4 | The Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming v. United States | green | “the factual allegations in the complaint are not controlling and only uncontroverted factual allegations are accepted as true.” | 18 |
| 5 | Aerolineas Argentinas, and Pakistan International Airlines v. United States | green | “in the absence of subject matter jurisdiction there can be no preclusive findings or conclusions on the merits, and dismissal for lack of jurisdiction is without prejudice.” | 15 |
| 6 | The Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming v. United States | green | “resolve these disputed predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings.” | 13 |
| 7 | Stroughter v. United States | green | “plead facts upon which a valid claim can rest.” | 11 |
| 8 | Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLC | green | “look to the true nature of the action . . . in determining jurisdiction of the appeal.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.