Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jennifer Arculeo v. On-Site Sales & Marketing, LLC and Sanford Pankin, Also Known as Crystal Hills, Docket No. 04-3807 Cv.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jennifer Arculeo v. On-Site Sales & Marketing, LLC and Sanford Pankin, Also Known as Crystal Hills, Docket No. 04-3807 Cv Anchor | green | “an employee, formally employed by one entity, who has been assigned to work in circumstances that justify the conclusion that the employee is at the same time constructively employed by another entity, may impose liability for violations of employment law on the constructive emp…” | 27 |
| 2 | National Labor Relations Board v. Solid Waste Services, Inc., Doing Business as J.P. Mascaro & Sons, Inc. | green | “relevant factors include commonality of hiring, firing, discipline, pay, insurance, records, and supervision.” | 16 |
| 3 | Lima v. Addeco | green | “separate legal entities have chosen to handle certain aspects of their employer-employee relationships jointly.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.