Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Kirkman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Kirkman Anchor | green | “a party may assign evidentiary error on appeal only on a specific ground made at trial.” | 27 |
| 2 | State v. Stenson | green | “a search warrant must be sufficiently definite so that the officer executing the warrant can identify the property sought with reasonable certainty.” | 7 |
| 3 | State v. Maddox | green | “either because it fails to describe with particularity items for which probable cause exists, or because it describes, particularly or otherwise, items for which probable cause does not exist.” | 6 |
| 4 | State v. Chambers | green | “officers executing a warrant for drugs are authorized to inspect virtually every aspect of the premises.” | 4 |
| 5 | State v. Maddox | green | “disputed items while executing the valid part of the warrant.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Homan | green | “after viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in a light most favorable to the state, a rational trier of fact could find each element of the crime proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.