Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Akin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Akin Anchor | green | “in a bench trial, no less than a jury trial, the resolution of credibility issues by the trier of fact and its determination of the weight to be accorded the evidence presented are entitled to great deference” | 8 |
| 2 | People v. Britt | green | “and, upon our review of the record, we cannot say that the court failed to give the evidence the weight that it should be accorded” | 7 |
| 3 | People v. Dashnaw | green | “failure to make a motion or an objection that has little or no chance of success” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Van Epps | green | “any error with respect to the admission of that testimony is harmless because, in a nonjury trial, the court is presumed to be capable of disregarding any improper or unduly prejudicial aspect of the evidence” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Van Epps | green | “in a nonjury trial, the court is presumed to be capable of disregarding any improper or unduly prejudicial aspect of the evidence” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Wimberly | green | “having failed to challenge the legal sufficiency of the trial evidence, defendant may not now challenge the legal sufficiency of the evidence before the grand jury” | 3 |
| 7 | Rodriguez v. Coughlin | green | “the fruits of the offense and the actual out-of-pocket loss to the victim caused by the offense” | 3 |
| 8 | People v. Santos-Sosa | green | “by stipulating to the admissibility of some of the summaries of other evidence, defendant waived his present contention that such summaries should not have been admitted in evidence” | 3 |
| 9 | People v. Johnson | green | “as a result, we may 'substitute our own discretion for that of a trial court which has not abused its discretion in the imposition of a sentence” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.