Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Narragansett Wire Co. v. Norberg.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Narragansett Wire Co. v. Norberg Anchor | green | “questions of law, however, are not binding upon the court and may be reviewed to determine what the law is and its applicability to the facts.” | 30 |
| 2 | Environmental Scientific Corp. v. Durfee | green | “the superior court is confined to a determination of whether there is any legally competent evidence to support the agency's decision.” | 16 |
| 3 | Center for Behavioral Health, Rhode Island, Inc. v. Barros | green | “in reviewing an administrative agency's decision, the superior court is limited to an examination of the certified record to determine whether the agency's decision is supported by substantial evidence” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.