Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Benjamin Stanley, Rufus Paul Harris.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Benjamin Stanley, Rufus Paul Harris Anchor | green | “a sentence imposed well below the statutory maximum penalty is an indicator of a reasonable sentence.” | 27 |
| 2 | United States v. Jesus Rosales-Bruno | green | “district courts have broad leeway in deciding how much weight to give to prior crimes the defendant has committed.” | 23 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.