Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Church of Scientology v. United States Department of the Army.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Church of Scientology v. United States Department of the Army Anchor | red | “is designed to avoid placing an unnecessary burden on the federal judiciary, and avoid the embarrassment of conflicting judgments.” | 28 |
| 2 | Kohn Law Group, Inc. v. Auto Parts Manufacturing Mississippi, Inc. | green | “look at whether there is 'substantial overlap' between the two suits.” | 22 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.