4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 207 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Leslie Woods v. Kilolo Kijakazi.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leslie Woods v. Kilolo Kijakazi Anchor | green | “the revised social security regulations are clearly irreconcilable with our caselaw according special deference to the opinions of treating and examining physicians on account of their relationship with the claimant.” | 83 |
| 2 | Leslie Woods v. Kilolo Kijakazi | green | “even under the new regulations, an alj cannot reject an examining or treating doctor's opinion as unsupported or inconsistent without providing an explanation supported by substantial evidence.” | 68 |
| 3 | Leslie Woods v. Kilolo Kijakazi | green | “now, an alj's decision, including the decision to discredit any medical opinion, must simply be supported by substantial evidence.” | 38 |
| 4 | Laurie Wellington v. Nancy Berryhill | green | “vidence of medical treatment successfully relieving symptoms can undermine a claim of disability.” | 18 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.