10 C.F.R. § 2.200

Scope of subpart

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) This subpart prescribes the procedures in cases initiated by the staff, or upon a request by any person, to impose requirements by order, or to modify, suspend, or revoke a license, or to take other action as may be proper, against any person subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. However, with regard to the holder of a part 76 certificate of compliance or compliance plan, except for civil penalty procedures in this subpart, the applicable procedures are set forth in § 76.70 of this chapter.

(b) This subpart also prescribes the procedures in cases initiated by the staff to impose civil penalties pursuant to section 234 of the Act and section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974.

[36 FR 16896, Aug. 26, 1971, as amended at 42 FR 28893, June 6, 1977; 48 FR 44172, Sept. 28, 1983; 62 FR 6668, Feb. 12, 1997]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1980–1985 · leading case: Susquehanna Valley All. v. Three Mile Island Nuclear Reactor, 619 F.2d 231 (3rd Cir. 1980).
Susquehanna Valley All. v. Three Mile Island Nuclear Reactor, 619 F.2d 231 (3rd Cir. 1980). “10 C.F.R. §§ 2.200 -.206 (1978). As currently codified, the Act provides for hearings in any proceedings “for the granting, suspending, revoking, or amending of any license or construction permit.”
Robert L. Liesen v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., 636 F.2d 94 (5th Cir. 1981). “206 (allowing any person to request the administrative initiation by the NRC of proceedings to revoke, suspend, modify, or take other action with respect to an operator’s license because of violations of regulations or license conditions).”
Aamodt v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 771 F.2d 720 (3rd Cir. 1985). · cites it 3× “Under 10 CFR § 2.200 -.206 (1985), the Commission is authorized to institute enforcement proceedings “to impose requirements by order, or to modify, suspend, or revoke a license, or to take other action as may be proper.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.