10 C.F.R. § 26.21
Fitness-for-duty program
The licensees and other entities specified in § 26.3(a) through (c) and (f) (for those licensees and other entities that do not implement the requirements in subparts M and K of this part) shall establish, implement, and maintain FFD programs that, at a minimum, comprise the program elements contained in this subpart. The individuals specified in § 26.4(a) through (e) and (g), and, at the licensee's or other entity's discretion, § 26.4(f), and, if necessary, § 26.4(j) shall be subject to these FFD programs. Licensees and other entities may rely on the FFD program or program elements of a C/V, as defined in § 26.5, if the C/V's FFD program or program elements satisfy the applicable requirements of this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2016–2018 · leading case: Wade Boldt v. N. States Power Co., 904 F.3d 586 (8th Cir. 2018).
Wade Boldt v. N. States Power Co., 904 F.3d 586 (8th Cir. 2018). “10 C.F.R. §§ 26.21 , .23. NSP's fitness-for-duty policy sets detailed expectations for employees.”
Stevens v. S. Nuclear Operating Co., 209 F. Supp. 3d 1372 (S.D. Ga. 2016). “10 C.F.R. § 26.21 . The FFD program must “[p]rovide reasonable assurance that individuals are not .”
Flores v. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., 313 F. Supp. 3d 511 (S.D. Ill. 2018). “See 10 C.F.R. §§ 26.21 , 73.56 (2018). The FFD program is designed to "[p]rovide reasonable assurance" that employees are "trustworthy and reliable" and "are not under the influence of any substance, legal or illegal, or mentally or physically impaired from any cause, which in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.