10 C.F.R. § 860.1
Purpose
The regulations in this part are issued for the protection and security of facilities, installations and real property subject to the jurisdiction or administration, or in the custody of, the Department of Energy.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1979–1982 · leading case: United States v. Best, 476 F. Supp. 34 (D. Colo. 1979).
United States v. Best, 476 F. Supp. 34 (D. Colo. 1979). “10 C.F.R. § 860.1 spells out the purpose of the regulations as the protection of the facilities under the jurisdiction of the Energy Research and Development Administration, and it says that “unauthorized entry upon any facility, installation, or real property subject to this…”
United States v. Karin L. Dukehart, Jeffrey Joe Hinton, & Chuck Dearborn David, Defendants, 687 F.2d 1301 (10th Cir. 1982). “, and 10 C.F.R. §§ 860.1 , et seq., as well as internal DOE standards published at 44 Fed.”
United States v. Thompson, 687 F.2d 1279 (10th Cir. 1982). “The regulations appear as 10 C.F.R. §§ 860.1 , et seq., hereinafter “the regulation.”
United States v. Seward, 687 F.2d 1270 (10th Cir. 1982). “, and 10 C.F.R. §§ 860.1 , et seq., as well as internal DOE standards published at 44 Fed.”
United States v. Jacqueline Peters & Pamela Teller, 687 F.2d 1295 (10th Cir. 1982). “, and 10 C.F.R. §§ 860.1 et seq., as well as internal DOE standards published at 44 Fed.”
United States v. Steve Robert Grose & Patrick Alexander Malone, 687 F.2d 1298 (10th Cir. 1982). “, and 10 C.F.R. §§ 860.1 , et seq., as well as internal DOE standards published at 44 Fed.”
United States v. Hueftle, 687 F.2d 1305 (10th Cir. 1982). “, and 10 C.F.R. §§ 860.1 , et seq., as well as internal DOE standards published at 44 Fed.”
United States v. Ficarra, 687 F.2d 1314 (10th Cir. 1982). “, and 10 C.F.R. §§ 860.1 , et seq., as well as internal DOE standards published at 44 Fed.”
United States v. Ellsberg, 687 F.2d 1316 (10th Cir. 1982). “, and 10 C.F.R. §§ 860.1 , et seq., as well as internal DOE standards published at 44 Fed.”
United States v. David S. Stewart, Kathy Lynn Clemence, & Dale Kepes, 687 F.2d 1312 (10th Cir. 1982). “, and 10 C.F.R. §§ 860.1 , et seq., as well as internal DOE standards published at 44 Fed.”
United States v. Pauline Pillow, Rachel MacNair Mary Axe, Steve Edward Brosnan, & Douglas Gillingham, 687 F.2d 1312 (10th Cir. 1982). “, and 10 C.F.R. §§ 860.1 , et seq., as well as internal DOE standards published at 44 Fed.”
United States v. Gruber, 687 F.2d 1313 (10th Cir. 1982). “, and 10 C.F.R. §§ 860.1 , et seq., as well as internal DOE standards published at 44 Fed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.