C.F.R. » Title 12 » CHAPTER III—FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION › SUBCHAPTER A—PROCEDURE AND RULES OF PRACTICE › PART 308—RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE › Subpart K—Procedures Applicable to Investigations Pursuant to Section 10(c) of the FDIA

12 C.F.R. § 308.148

Rights of witnesses

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

In an investigation:

(a) Any person compelled or requested to furnish testimony, documentary evidence, or other information, shall upon request be shown and provided with a copy of the order initiating the proceeding;

(b) Any person compelled or requested to provide testimony as a witness or to furnish documentary evidence may be represented by a counsel who meets the requirements of § 308.6 of the Uniform Rules. That counsel may be present and may:

(1) Advise the witness before, during, and after such testimony;

(2) Briefly question the witness at the conclusion of such testimony for clarification purposes; and

(3) Make summary notes during such testimony solely for the use and benefit of the witness;

(c) All persons testifying shall be sequestered. Such persons and their counsel shall not be present during the testimony of any other person, unless permitted in the discretion of the person conducting the investigation. Neither attorney(s) for the institution that is the subject of the investigation, nor attorney(s) for any other interested persons, shall have any right to be present during the testimony of any witness not personally represented by such attorney;

(d) In cases of a perceived or actual conflict of interest arising out of an attorney's or law firm's representation of multiple witnesses, the person conducting the investigation may require the attorney to comply with the provisions of § 308.8 of the Uniform Rules; and

(e) Witness fees shall be paid in accordance with § 308.14 of the Uniform Rules.

[56 FR 37975, Aug. 9, 1991, as amended at 64 FR 62100, Nov. 16, 1999; 80 FR 5013, Jan. 30, 2015]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2013–2013 · leading case: Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Bd. v. Attorney Doe No. 762, 839 N.W.2d 620 (Iowa 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Bd. v. Attorney Doe No. 762, 839 N.W.2d 620 (Iowa 2013). “, 12 C.F.R. § 308.148 (b) (2013) (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation); id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.