C.F.R. » Title 12 » CHAPTER III—FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION › SUBCHAPTER B—REGULATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF GENERAL POLICY › PART 327—ASSESSMENTS › Subpart A—In General

12 C.F.R. § 327.9

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2024–2026 · leading case: Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Bank of Am., N.A. (D.D.C. 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Bank of Am., N.A. (D.D.C. 2025). · cites it 2× “at 10672 (codified at 12 C.F.R. § 327.9 (b)(2) (2011)). In promulgating the 2011 Rule, the FDIC aimed to “revise the large insured depository institution assessment system to better differentiate for risk and better take into account losses from large institution failures that…”
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Bank of Am., N.A. (D.D.C. 2025). · cites it 2× “at 10672 (codified at 12 C.F.R. § 327.9 (b)(2) (2011)). In promulgating the 2011 Rule, the FDIC aimed to “revise the large insured depository institution assessment system to better differentiate for risk and better take into account losses from large institution failures that…”
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Bank of Am., N.A. (D.D.C. 2024). “25, 2011) (codified at 12 C.F.R. § 327.9 (b)(2)). The 2011 Rule sought to measure more accurately an HCI’s risk based on recent experience that “show[ed] that the concentration of [an HCI’s] exposures to a small number of counterparties .”
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Bank of Am., N.A. (D.D.C. 2026). “at 10688-10703 (codified at 12 C.F.R. § 327.9 (b)(2) (2011)). The 2011 Rule went into effect on April 1, 2011.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.