12 C.F.R. § 330.13

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1985–1994 · leading case: Lee v. Gutierrez, 876 S.W.2d 382 (Tex. App. 1994).
Lee v. Gutierrez, 876 S.W.2d 382 (Tex. App. 1994). “12 C.F.R. § 330.13 (1993). This regulation indicates that IRA funds are intended to be subject to the same risk of loss as other deposits.”
Faic Sec., Inc. v. United States, 768 F.2d 352 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “at 13,011, 13,012 (to be codified at 12 C.F.R. §§ 330.13 (b), 564.12(b)). Appellees FAIC and SIA each filed separate actions in the District Court against both of the appellants, seeking judicial review pursuant to 5 U.”
Kenneth D. Lee & Norma B. Lee v. Jorge A. Gutierrez, Liquidating Agent for Rio Grande Sav. & Loan Ass'n, & Rio Grande Sav. & Loan Ass'n (Tex. App. 1994). “Accordingly, we conclude that IRA accounts are general deposits under Texas law and not entitled to priority over Rio Grande's other depositors.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.