12 C.F.R. § 408.3
Applicability
Historically, virtually all financing provided by Eximbank has been in aid of U.S. exports which involve no effects on the quality of the environment within the United States, its territories or possessions. Eximbank has separate procedures for conducting environmental reviews where such reviews are required by E.O. 12114 (January 4, 1979) because of potential effects on the environment of global commons areas or on the environment of foreign nations. The procedures set forth in this part apply to the relatively rare cases where Eximbank financing of U.S. exports may affect environmental quality in the United States, its territories or possessions.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2007–2015 · leading case: Chesapeake Climate Action Network v. Exp.-Imp. Bank of the United States, 78 F. Supp. 3d 208 (D.D.C. 2015).
Chesapeake Climate Action Network v. Exp.-Imp. Bank of the United States, 78 F. Supp. 3d 208 (D.D.C. 2015). “exports which involve no effects on the quality of the environment within the United States,” 12 C.F.R. 408.3, it adopted procedures to govern “the.”
Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Mosbacher, 488 F. Supp. 2d 889 (N.D. Cal. 2007). “” 12 C.F.R. § 408.3 . 13 . At oral argument, Plaintiffs stated that they ask for a declaration that each Defendant's conclusion about the "insignificance" of their actions is contrary to law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.