12 C.F.R. § 7.4001

Charging interest by national banks at rates permitted competing institutions; charging interest to corporate borrowers

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Definition. The term “interest” as used in 12 U.S.C. 85 includes any payment compensating a creditor or prospective creditor for an extension of credit, making available of a line of credit, or any default or breach by a borrower of a condition upon which credit was extended. It includes, among other things, the following fees connected with credit extension or availability: numerical periodic rates, late fees, creditor-imposed not sufficient funds (NSF) fees charged when a borrower tenders payment on a debt with a check drawn on insufficient funds, overlimit fees, annual fees, cash advance fees, and membership fees. It does not ordinarily include appraisal fees, premiums and commissions attributable to insurance guaranteeing repayment of any extension of credit, finders' fees, fees for document preparation or notarization, or fees incurred to obtain credit reports.

(b) Authority. A national bank located in a state may charge interest at the maximum rate permitted to any state-chartered or licensed lending institution by the law of that state. If state law permits different interest charges on specified classes of loans, a national bank making such loans is subject only to the provisions of state law relating to that class of loans that are material to the determination of the permitted interest. For example, a national bank may lawfully charge the highest rate permitted to be charged by a state-licensed small loan company, without being so licensed, but subject to state law limitations on the size of loans made by small loan companies.

(c) Effect on state definitions of interest. The Federal definition of the term “interest” in paragraph (a) of this section does not change how interest is defined by the individual states (nor how the state definition of interest is used) solely for purposes of state law. For example, if late fees are not “interest” under state law where a national bank is located but state law permits its most favored lender to charge late fees, then a national bank located in that state may charge late fees to its intrastate customers. The national bank may also charge late fees to its interstate customers because the fees are interest under the Federal definition of interest and an allowable charge under state law where the national bank is located. However, the late fees would not be treated as interest for purposes of evaluating compliance with state usury limitations because state law excludes late fees when calculating the maximum interest that lending institutions may charge under those limitations.

(d) Usury. A national bank located in a state the law of which denies the defense of usury to a corporate borrower may charge a corporate borrower any rate of interest agreed upon by a corporate borrower.

(e) Transferred loans. Interest on a loan that is permissible under 12 U.S.C. 85 shall not be affected by the sale, assignment, or other transfer of the loan.

[61 FR 4862, Feb. 9, 1996, as amended at 66 FR 34791, July 2, 2001; 85 FR 33536, June 2, 2020]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 64 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1996–2025 · leading case: Fawcett v. Citizens Bank, N.A., 919 F.3d 133 (1st Cir. 2019).
Fawcett v. Citizens Bank, N.A., 919 F.3d 133 (1st Cir. 2019). · cites it 16× “- 3 - 12 C.F.R. § 7.4001 (a) (bullet points and line breaks added).”
In re TD Bank, N.A., 150 F. Supp. 3d 593 (D.S.C. 2015). · cites it 5× “The Bank points to OCC regulations, which differentiate between bank, charges of interest, governed by 12 C.F.R. § 7.4001 , and non-interest charges and fees, governed by 12 C.”
Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A., 517 U.S. 735 (1996). · cites it 2× “4869 (to be codified in 12 CFR § 7.4001 (a)). Petitioner proposes several reasons why the ordinary rule of deference should not apply to this regulation.”
Video Trax, Inc. v. NationsBank, N.A., 33 F. Supp. 2d 1041 (S.D. Fla. 1998). · cites it 6× “12 C.F.R. § 7.4001 (a) (1997). Because the OD fees were not imposed in connection with a credit transaction, the fees are not interest as defined by the Bank Act.”
Farrell v. Bank of Am., N.A., 224 F. Supp. 3d 1016 (S.D. Cal. 2016). · cites it 4× “Of some relevance to the present motion, it includes “creditor-imposed not sufficient funds (NSF) fees charged when a borrower tenders payments on a debt with a check drawn on insufficient funds.”
West Virginia ex rel. McGraw v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., 842 F. Supp. 2d 984 (S.D.W. Va 2012). · cites it 5× “It includes, among other things, the following fees connected with credit extension or availability: numerical periodic rates, late fees, creditor-imposed not sufficient funds (NSF) fees charged when a borrower tenders payment on a debt with a check drawn on insufficient funds,…”
Jim Hood v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., et a, 737 F.3d 78 (5th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “It includes, among other things, the following fees connected with credit extension or availability: numerical periodic rates, late fees, creditor-imposed not sufficient funds (NSF) fees charged when a borrower tenders payment on a debt with a check drawn on insufficient funds,…”
Johnson v. BOKF Nat'l Assn, 15 F.4th 356 (5th Cir. 2021). · cites it 2× “In regulations promulgated through notice-and-comment rulemaking, OCC issued 12 C.F.R. § 7.4001 (a), which defines the term “interest” as it is 2 Case: 18-11375 Document: 00516035490 Page: 3 Date Filed: 09/29/2021 No.”
Michael Lutz v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., 49 F.4th 323 (3rd Cir. 2022). “That regula- tion—12 C.F.R. § 7.4001(e)—provides: “[i]nterest on a loan that is permissible under 12 U.”
Akopyan v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., Inc., 215 Cal. App. 4th 120 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 3× “( 12 C.F.R. § 7.4001 (a) (2013); Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.”
Hawaii Ex Rel. Louie v. HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A., 761 F.3d 1027 (9th Cir. 2014). “It does not ordinarily include appraisal fees, premiums and commissions attributable to insurance guaranteeing repayment of any extension of credit, finders’ fees, fees for document preparation or notarization, or fees incurred to obtain credit reports.”
Discover Bank v. Vaden, 489 F.3d 594 (4th Cir. 2007). · cites it 4× “In arguing that the FDIA completely preempts state-law usury claims, the FDIC relies on Beneficial National Bank, agreeing with the First and Third Circuits, that in § 1831d, "Congress created a federal cause of action that entirely replaced .”
— 12 C.F.R. § 7.4001(a) — 3 cases
State ex rel. Louie v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., 921 F. Supp. 2d 1059 (D. Haw. 2013).
Doe v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A., 107 F.3d 1297 (8th Cir. 1997).
— 12 C.F.R. § 7.4001(b) — 2 cases
Moore v. MB Fin. Bank, N.A., 280 F. Supp. 3d 1069 (N.D. Ill. 2017).
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Gallabrese, 2025 Ohio 733 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025).
— 12 C.F.R. § 7.4001(e) — 1 case
Michael Lutz v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., 49 F.4th 323 (3rd Cir. 2022). “That regula- tion—12 C.F.R. § 7.4001(e)—provides: “[i]nterest on a loan that is permissible under 12 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.