13 C.F.R. § 126.100
What is the purpose of the HUBZone program?
The purpose of the HUBZone program is to provide federal contracting assistance for small business concerns located in historically underutilized business zones in an effort to increase employment opportunities, investment, and economic development in such areas.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2004–2024 · leading case: Contract Servs., Inc. v. United States, 104 Fed. Cl. 261 (Fed. Cl. 2012).
Contract Servs., Inc. v. United States, 104 Fed. Cl. 261 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “13 C.F.R. §§ 126.100 -.900 (2011). A brief review of the HUBZone Act follows.”
Metro Mach. Corp. v. United States Small Bus. Admin., 305 F. Supp. 2d 614 (E.D. Va. 2004). “” 13 C.F.R. § 126.100 (2002). Small businesses that are “qualified HUBZone SBCs” are given a ten percent price evaluation preference in qualifying for federal government contracts.”
Diversified Maint. Sys., Inc. v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 122 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “” 13 C.F.R. § 126.100 . Criteria for eligibility include having a principal office in certain locations, 15 U.”
Aeolus Sys., LLC v. United States, 79 Fed. Cl. 1 (Fed. Cl. 2007). “” 13 C.F.R. § 126.100 (2007); Diversified Maint.”
Dorado Servs., Inc. v. United States, 128 Fed. Cl. 375 (Fed. Cl. 2016). “Understanding the HUBZone Program, supra; see also 13 C.F.R. § 126.100 . To participate in the program, a small business must first obtain certification from SBA See 13 C.”
Mission Critical Solutions v. United States, 96 Fed. Cl. 657 (Fed. Cl. 2011). “See 13 C.F.R. § 126.100 through § 126.900. The requirements for certification as a qualified HUBZone SBC are set out in 13 C.”
RCD Cleaning Serv., Inc. v. United States, 97 Fed. Cl. 582 (Fed. Cl. 2011). “” 13 C.F.R. § 126.100 (2010). RCD asserts that its principal office is located in a HUBZone in Phoenix, Arizona.”
Dinah Bostic Norman v. John Arthur Norman, IV (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). “101 (2017), for qualified HUBZone5 small businesses, 13 C.F.R. § 126.100 (2017), and for woman-owned small businesses, 13 C.”
Smith v. Athena Constr. Grp., Inc. (D.D.C. 2022). “TAC ¶¶ 47–48; see also 13 C.F.R. § 126.100 (2021). To further these goals, Congress set aside specific contracts for HUBZone businesses and gave HUBZone firms like Athena a favorable 10% bid-price discount on general government contracting.”
Smith v. Athena Constr. Grp., Inc. (D.D.C. 2024). “” 13 C.F.R. § 126.100 . The HUBZone program gives preferences in government contracting to businesses that, among other things, are located in a designated HUBZone and that have projects staffed by employees residing in HUBZones.”
RCD Cleaning Serv., Inc. v. United States, 97 Fed. Cl. 602 (Fed. Cl. 2011). “” 13 C.F.R. § 126.100 (2010). RCD asserts that its principal office is located in a HUBZone in Phoenix, Arizona.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.