13 C.F.R. § 134.1010

Standard of review and burden of proof

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The protested concern has the burden of proving its eligibility, by a preponderance of the evidence.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Vet. Elevated Solutions, LLC v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2025).
Vet. Elevated Solutions, LLC v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2025). “’s Reply at 5 (citing 13 C.F.R. § 134.1010 ); see also Def-Intervenor’s Reply at 6.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.