14 C.F.R. § 121.356
Collision avoidance system
Effective January 1, 2005, any airplane you operate under this part must be equipped and operated according to the following table:
| If you operate any— | Then you must operate that airplane with— |
|---|---|
| (a) Turbine-powered airplane of more than 33,000 pounds maximum certificated takeoff weight | (1) An appropriate class of Mode S transponder that meets Technical Standard Order (TSO) C-112, or a later version, and one of the following approved units: (i) TCAS II that meets TSO C-119b (version 7.0), or takeoff weight a later version. |
| (ii) TCAS II that meets TSO C-119a (version 6.04A Enhanced) that was installed in that airplane before May 1, 2003. If that TCAS II version 6.04A Enhanced no longer can be repaired to TSO C-119a standards, it must be replaced with a TCAS II that meets TSO C-119b (version 7.0), or a later version. (iii) A collision avoidance system equivalent to TSO C-119b (version 7.0), or a later version, capable of coordinating with units that meet TSO C-119a (version 6.04A Enhanced), or a later version. | |
| (b) Passenger or combination cargo/passenger (combi) airplane that has a passenger seat configuration of 10-30 seats | (1) TCAS I that meets TSO C-118, or a later version, or (2) A collision avoidance system equivalent to has a TSO C-118, or a later version, or (3) A collision avoidance system and Mode S transponder that meet paragraph (a)(1) of this section. |
| (c) Piston-powered airplane of more than 33,000 pounds maximum certificated takeoff weight | (1) TCAS I that meets TSO C-118, or a later version, or (2) A collision avoidance system equivalent to maximum TSO C-118, or a later version, or (3) A collision avoidance system and Mode S transponder that meet paragraph (a)(1) of this section. |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1992–2003 · leading case: Lakomy v. United States, 70 F. App'x 199 (5th Cir. 2003).
Lakomy v. United States, 70 F. App'x 199 (5th Cir. 2003). “§ 44716 ; 14 C.F.R. § 121.356 . TCAS makes second-by-second calculations of the trajectories of aircraft in its vicinity.”
First Fid. Bank, Nat'l Ass'n, New Jersey v. E. Air Lines, Inc. (In re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc.), 147 B.R. 325 (S.D.N.Y. 1992). “14 C.F.R. § 121.356 . The FAA’s finding that Midway could not operate the Collateral Aircraft was based upon the proportion of TCAS system equipped *329 aircraft which Midway operated, and was not a determination that the Collateral Aircraft were not airworthy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.