C.F.R. » Title 14 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION › SUBCHAPTER G—AIR CARRIERS AND OPERATORS FOR COMPENSATION OR HIRE: CERTIFICATION AND OPERATIONS › PART 121—OPERATING REQUIREMENTS: DOMESTIC, FLAG, AND SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS › Subpart M—Airman and Crewmember Requirements

14 C.F.R. § 121.397

Emergency and emergency evacuation duties

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Each certificate holder shall, for each type and model of airplane, assigned to each category of required crewmember, as appropriate, the necessary functions to be performed in an emergency or a situation requiring emergency evacuation. The certificate holder shall show those functions are realistic, can be practically accomplished, and will meet any reasonably anticipated emergency including the possible incapacitation of individual crewmembers or their inability to reach the passenger cabin because of shifting cargo in combination cargo-passenger airplanes.

(b) The certificate holder shall describe in its manual the functions of each category of required crewmembers under paragraph (a) of this section.

[Docket 2033, 30 FR 3206, Mar. 9, 1965, as amended by Amdt. 121-7, 30 FR 6727, May 18, 1965]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1977–2022 · leading case: Curtin v. Port Auth. of New York & New Jer., 183 F. Supp. 2d 664 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Curtin v. Port Auth. of New York & New Jer., 183 F. Supp. 2d 664 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “310 (Additional Emergency Equipment); 14 C.F.R. § 121.397 (Emergency and Emergency Evacuation Duties); 14 C.”
Harriss v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc., 437 F. Supp. 413 (N.D. Cal. 1977). “-394(d); (2) to assign emergency functions to crewmembers, 14 C.F.R. § 121.397 ; and (3) to conduct initial, transition, and recurrent training of flight attendants using F.”
Binci v. Alaska Airlines, Inc. (D. Or. 2022). “And 14 C.F.R. § 121.397 applies to “emergency and emergency evacuation duties” and is inapplicable to the factual allegations in the proposed amended complaint.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.