14 C.F.R. § 13.1
Re-delegation
Unless otherwise specified, the Chief Counsel, each Deputy Chief Counsel, and the Assistant Chief Counsel for Enforcement may re-delegate the authority delegated to them under this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1974–1998 · leading case: Clyde Blincoe, D/B/A Instead Sky Sports v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 37 F.3d 462 (9th Cir. 1994).
Clyde Blincoe, D/B/A Instead Sky Sports v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 37 F.3d 462 (9th Cir. 1994). “Blincoe’s complaint was a “report of a violation” submitted to the District Office of the FAA pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.1 , rather than a “formal complaint” filed with the Administrator of the FAA in Washington, D.”
Edward Luedtke v. Cnty. of Milwaukee, 521 F.2d 387 (7th Cir. 1975). “” 14 C.F.R. § 13.1 . The plaintiffs have failed to indicate why, if the County is violating provisions of the Federal Aviation Act or any regulations issued thereunder, adequate relief is not available through the FAA.”
Redmon ex rel. Redmon v. United States, 934 F.2d 1151 (10th Cir. 1991). “See also 14 C.F.R. § 13.1 (1988) (upon report of violation, nature and type of FAA investigation or enforcement action discretionary); 14 C.”
Luedtke v. Cnty. of Milwaukee, 371 F. Supp. 1040 (E.D. Wis. 1974). “City of Los Angeles, supra; Federal Aviation Administration regulation at 14 C.F.R. 13.1; Cf. Department of Transportation Act of 1966, 49 U.”
Air Canada v. Dep't of Transp., 148 F.3d 1142 (D.C. Cir. 1998). “See 14 C.F.R. §§ 13.1 , 13.3, 13.5 (1998); see, e.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.