(a) A person directly and substantially affected by any alleged noncompliance or a person qualified under 49 CFR 26.105(c) may file a complaint under this part. A person doing business with an airport and paying fees or rentals to the airport shall be considered directly and substantially affected by alleged revenue diversion as defined in 49 U.S.C. 47107(b).
(b) Complaints filed under this part shall—
(1) State the name and address of each person who is the subject of the complaint and, with respect to each person, the specific provisions of each Act that the complainant believes were violated;
(2) Include all documents then available in the exercise of reasonable diligence, to be offered in support of the complaint, and to be served upon all persons named in the complaint as persons responsible for the alleged action(s) or omission(s) upon which the complaint is based;
(3) Provide a concise but complete statement of the facts relied upon to substantiate each allegation; and
(4) Except for complaints filed under 49 CFR 26.105(c), describe how the complainant was directly and substantially affected by the things done or omitted to be done by the respondents.
(c) Unless the complaint is dismissed pursuant to § 16.25 or § 16.27, the FAA notifies the complainant and respondent in writing within 20 days after the date the FAA receives the complaint that the complaint has been docketed.
(d) The respondent shall file an answer within 20 days of the date of service of the FAA notification or, if a motion is filed under § 16.26, within 20 days of the date of service of an FAA order denying all or part of that motion.
(e) The complainant may file a reply within 10 days of the date of service of the answer.
(f) The respondent may file a rebuttal within 10 days of the date of service of the complainant's reply.
(g) The answer, reply, and rebuttal shall, like the complaint, be accompanied by supporting documentation upon which the parties rely.
(h) The answer shall deny or admit the allegations made in the complaint or state that the person filing the document is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny an allegation, and shall assert any affirmative defense.
(i) The answer, reply, and rebuttal shall each contain a concise but complete statement of the facts relied upon to substantiate the answers, admissions, denials, or averments made.
(j) Amendments or supplements to the pleadings described in this section will not be allowed without showing good cause through a motion and supporting documents.
(k) Burden of proof. Except as used in subpart F of this part,
(1) The burden of proof is on the complainant to show noncompliance with an Act or any regulation, order, agreement or document of conveyance issued under the authority of an Act.
(2) Except as otherwise provided by statute or rule, the proponent of a motion, request, or order has the burden of proof.
(3) A party who has asserted an affirmative defense has the burden of proving the affirmative defense.
(l) Except for good cause shown through motion and supporting documents, discovery is not permitted except as provided in §§ 16.213 and 16.215.
[Doc. No. 27783, 61 FR 54004, Oct. 16, 1996, as amended at Amdt. 16-1, 78 FR 56143, Sept. 12, 2013]
Notes of Decisions
Penobscot Air Servs., Ltd. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 164 F.3d 713 (1st Cir. 1999).
· cites it 3× “The regulations require the complaint and all successive pleadings to provide a “complete statement of the facts relied upon to substantiate each allegation” or “averment[ ] made,”- 14 C.F.R. § 16.23 (b)(3) and (i), and require the parties to supply all “supporting documentation…”
Palm Beach Cnty. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 53 F.4th 1318 (11th Cir. 2022).
· cites it 4× “6(a), and the complain- ant doesn’t have to be affected by the violation, see id. § 5.2. Part 13 complaints are typically handled by the FAA Airports District Office and its Regional Airports Divisions.”
BMI Salvage Corp. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 272 F. App'x 842 (11th Cir. 2008).
· cites it 2× “See 14 CFR § 16.23 (West 2008) ("Part 16”). The complaint must provide a concise but complete statement of the facts relied upon to substantiate each allegation.”
Boca Airport, Inc. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 389 F.3d 185 (D.C. Cir. 2004).
“” 14 C.F.R. § 16.23 . The regulations define noncompliance as “anything done or omitted to be done by any person in contravention of any provision of any Act .”
41 North 73 West, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Transp., 408 F. App'x 393 (2d Cir. 2010).
“14 C.F.R. § 16.23 (a). If the pleadings reveal a “reasonable basis for further investigation,” the FAA investigates the allegations, after which the Director of the Office of Airport Safety and Standards issues an “initial determination.”
Friends of the East Hampton Airport, Inc. v. Town of East Hampton, 152 F. Supp. 3d 90 (E.D.N.Y 2015).
“14 C.F.R. § 16.23 (a). If the pleadings demonstrate a “reasonable basis for further investigation,” the FAA investigates the allegations, after which the Director of the Office of Airport Safety and Standards issues an “initial determination.”
BMI Salvage Corp. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 488 F. App'x 341 (11th Cir. 2012).
“In 2005, BMI and Blueside filed a complaint with the FAA under 14 C.F.R. § 16.23 (Part 16 complaint), alleging the County engaged in unjust discrimination when it awarded only certain tenants leases to develop the property.”
ASHEVILLE JET, INC. v. City of Asheville, 689 S.E.2d 162 (N.C. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 6× “Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 16.23 , any "person directly and substantially affected by any alleged noncompliance" with the AAIA, including grant assurances, "may file a complaint with the [FAA] Administrator.”
Kunz v. FAA (10th Cir. 2025).
· cites it 2× “” 14 C.F.R. § 16.23 (a). A Part 16 complaint must contain “the specific provisions” of a grant agreement8 “that the complainant believes were violated.”
Susan Boggs v. FAA (6th Cir. 2019).
“See 14 C.F.R. § 16.23 (k) (the complainant carries the burden of proof).”
Atl. Beechcraft Servs. v. FAA (D.C. Cir. 2022).
“Persons “directly and substantially affected by any alleged noncompliance” with a grant assurance may file a complaint with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) under 14 C.F.R. § 16.23 . Such a complaint is known as a Part 16 complaint.”
— 14 C.F.R. § 16.23(b)(3) — 1 case
— 14 C.F.R. § 16.23(g) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.