C.F.R. » Title 14 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION › SUBCHAPTER C—AIRCRAFT › PART 25—AIRWORTHINESS STANDARDS: TRANSPORT CATEGORY AIRPLANES › Subpart D—Design and Construction

14 C.F.R. § 25.601

General

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The airplane may not have design features or details that experience has shown to be hazardous or unreliable. The suitability of each questionable design detail and part must be established by tests.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2007–2009 · leading case: Martin Ex Rel. Heckman v. MIDWEST EXP. HOLDINGS, 555 F.3d 806 (9th Cir. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Martin Ex Rel. Heckman v. MIDWEST EXP. HOLDINGS, 555 F.3d 806 (9th Cir. 2009). “" 14 C.F.R. § 25.601 . The agency generally uses sections 25.”
Martin v. Midwest Express Holdings, Inc., 555 F.3d 806 (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “” 14 C.F.R. § 25.601 . The agency generally uses sections 25.”
United States Ex Rel. Smith v. Boeing Co., 505 F. Supp. 2d 974 (D. Kan. 2007). “607 ); failed to comply with a prohibition on design features or details that experience has shown to be unreliable, and a provision requiring the suitability of each questionable design detail and part to be established by tests ( 14 CFR § 25.601 ); and failed to comply with…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.