14 C.F.R. § 25.803

Emergency evacuation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Each crew and passenger area must have emergency means to allow rapid evacuation in crash landings, with the landing gear extended as well as with the landing gear retracted, considering the possibility of the airplane being on fire.

(b) [Reserved]

(c) For airplanes having a seating capacity of more than 44 passengers, it must be shown that the maximum seating capacity, including the number of crewmembers required by the operating rules for which certification is requested, can be evacuated from the airplane to the ground under simulated emergency conditions within 90 seconds. Compliance with this requirement must be shown by actual demonstration using the test criteria outlined in appendix J of this part unless the Administrator finds that a combination of analysis and testing will provide data equivalent to that which would be obtained by actual demonstration.

(d)-(e) [Reserved]

[Doc. No. 24344, 55 FR 29781, July 20, 1990]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1977–2017 · leading case: Flyers Rights Educ. Fund, Inc. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 864 F.3d 738 (D.C. Cir. 2017).
Flyers Rights Educ. Fund, Inc. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 864 F.3d 738 (D.C. Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “See 14 C.F.R. § 25.803 (c) (requiring that aircraft with a capacity of more than forty-four passengers be capable of evacuation within ninety seconds, and that actual egress demonstrations be undertaken to ensure compliance with Administration regulations).”
Hudson v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 192 F.3d 1031 (D.C. Cir. 1999). · cites it 2× “14 C.F.R. § 25.803 (c) (emphasis added). The regulation as originally promulgated in 1967 required an actual demonstration when the design of an aircraft was altered to allow a passenger capacity increase of greater than five percent.”
Gardner v. Nat'l Airlines, Inc., 434 F. Supp. 249 (S.D. Fla. 1977). “At least once a year recurrent training is required of all flight attendants and 100% of that time is devoted to a review and up-dating of safety techniques. 14 C.F.R. § 121.427 (b)(3). National did not require agility drills of its flight attendants until recently.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.