C.F.R. » Title 14 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION › SUBCHAPTER D—AIRMEN › PART 60—FLIGHT SIMULATION TRAINING DEVICE INITIAL AND CONTINUING QUALIFICATION AND USE

14 C.F.R. § 60.14

Special equipment and personnel requirements for qualification of the FSTD

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

When notified by the responsible Flight Standards office, the sponsor must make available all special equipment and qualified personnel needed to accomplish or assist in the accomplishment of tests during initial qualification, continuing qualification, or special evaluations.

[Docket FAA-2002-12461, 71 FR 63426, Oct. 30, 2006, as amended by Docket FAA-2022-1355, Amdt. 60-7, 87 FR 75711, Dec. 9, 2022]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1970–1993 · leading case: Steering Comm. v. United States of Am., & Aeromexico, 6 F.3d 572 (9th Cir. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Steering Comm. v. United States of Am., & Aeromexico, 6 F.3d 572 (9th Cir. 1993). “Id. at 707. The estate of Miller argued that Miller was excused from the right-of-way rules because the district court had found that a “ ‘reasonable lookout’ ” might not have seen the Cessna “ ‘because of his limited visibility and the camouflage effect of the background.”
Kochendorfer v. United States, 193 Ct. Cl. 1045 (Ct. Cl. 1970). “By construction of this course, defendant concludes that the F-86L formation was actually 45 degrees to Lewis’ right and that, therefore, under applicable civil air regulations, it was the duty of Lewis to give way to the aircraft on his right, citing 14 C.F.R. 60.14(b). Based…”
— 14 C.F.R. § 60.14(b) — 1 case
Kochendorfer v. United States, 193 Ct. Cl. 1045 (Ct. Cl. 1970). “By construction of this course, defendant concludes that the F-86L formation was actually 45 degrees to Lewis’ right and that, therefore, under applicable civil air regulations, it was the duty of Lewis to give way to the aircraft on his right, citing 14 C.F.R. 60.14(b). Based…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.