14 C.F.R. § 77.1
Purpose
This part establishes:
(a) The requirements to provide notice to the FAA of certain proposed construction, or the alteration of existing structures;
(b) The standards used to determine obstructions to air navigation, and navigational and communication facilities;
(c) The process for aeronautical studies of obstructions to air navigation or navigational facilities to determine the effect on the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace, air navigation facilities or equipment; and
(d) The process to petition the FAA for discretionary review of determinations, revisions, and extensions of determinations.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1971–2026 · leading case: City of Rochester v. Bond, 603 F.2d 927 (D.C. Cir. 1979).
City of Rochester v. Bond, 603 F.2d 927 (D.C. Cir. 1979). “” 14 C.F.R. §§ 77.1 et seq. These regulations provide, first, that persons proposing to build or modify structures having specified characteristics must give notice to the FAA.”
The CARROLL AIRPORT Comm'n, Appellee, v. Loren W. DANNER & Pan Danner, Appellants., 927 N.W.2d 635 (Iowa 2019). “14 C.F.R. § 77.1 (2018). The regulations state that obstructions are presumed to be airport hazards unless an aeronautical study determines otherwise.”
Reminga v. United States, 448 F. Supp. 445 (W.D. Mich. 1978). “However, by federal regulation there must be an investigation conducted by the FAA into the effect such a tower would have on navigation, 14 CFR § 77.1 et seq. 2 This cause of action concerns the federal investigation of this tower, and it is this upon which the court focuses…”
Goodspeed Airport, LLC v. East Haddam Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Comm'n, 632 F. Supp. 2d 185 (D. Conn. 2009). “See 14 C.F.R. § 77.1 et seq. Goodspeed contends that because of the wetlands’ location on its property, its action usually would require a permit from the East Haddam Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Com *187 mission (“IWWC”) because the cutting or removal of the trees would…”
Air Line Pilots' Ass'n Int'l v. Dep't of Transp., Fed. Aviation Admin., John H. Shaffer, Adm'r, 446 F.2d 236 (5th Cir. 1971). “” See 14 C.F.R. §§ 77.1 et seq. The pertinent provisions of these regulations are divided into three subparts.”
Tessa Warren, individually & in her capacity as Adm'x of the Est. of Kevin M. Warren v. Appalachian Power C (wvactapp 2026). “” 14 C.F.R. § 77.1 (b) (2011). 14 C.F.R. § 77.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.