14 C.F.R. § 91.125
ATC light signals
ATC light signals have the meaning shown in the following table:
| Color and type of signal | Meaning with respect to aircraft on the surface | Meaning with respect to aircraft in flight |
|---|---|---|
| Steady green | Cleared for takeoff | Cleared to land. |
| Flashing green | Cleared to taxi | Return for landing (to be followed by steady green at proper time). |
| Steady red | Stop | Give way to other aircraft and continue circling. |
| Flashing red | Taxi clear of runway in use | Airport unsafe—do not land. |
| Flashing white | Return to starting point on airport | Not applicable. |
| Alternating red and green | Exercise extreme caution | Exercise extreme caution. |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1974–1986 · leading case: Texasgulf Inc. v. Colt Elec. Co., 615 F. Supp. 648 (S.D.N.Y. 1984).
Texasgulf Inc. v. Colt Elec. Co., 615 F. Supp. 648 (S.D.N.Y. 1984). “14 C.F.R. §§ 91.125 (c) and 91.129 (1984).”
Daley v. United States, 792 F.2d 1081 (11th Cir. 1986). “See 14 C.F.R. § 91.125 . . Mellish was employed by Tampa Air Center, Inc.”
Ins. Co. of State of Pa. v. United States, 590 F. Supp. 435 (S.D. Miss. 1984). “This is because when flying IFR the pilot’s visibility is hampered by the weather and a pilot must rely on his instruments to keep his aircraft flying in the proper direction and at the desired altitude and airspeed. When flying in IFR conditions, the pilot navigates by…”
Bibler v. Young, 492 F.2d 1351 (6th Cir. 1974). “14 C.F.R. § 91.125 (1973). (4)(e) Overtaking.”
Ann E. Bibler, Admx. Of the Est. of Ralph Bibler, Deceased v. Berry H. Young, Jr., United States of Am., & the Fed. Aviation Admin., Third-Partyplaintiffs-Appellants v. Berry H. Young, Jr., Third-Party, 492 F.2d 1351 (3rd Cir. 1974). “14 C.F.R. 91.125 (1973). 38 (4) (e) Overtaking.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.