14 C.F.R. § 91.183

IFR communications

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, the pilot in command of each aircraft operated under IFR in controlled airspace must ensure that a continuous watch is maintained on the appropriate frequency and must report the following as soon as possible—

(a) The time and altitude of passing each designated reporting point, or the reporting points specified by ATC, except that while the aircraft is under radar control, only the passing of those reporting points specifically requested by ATC need be reported;

(b) Any unforecast weather conditions encountered; and

(c) Any other information relating to the safety of flight.

[Docket 18334, 54 FR 34294, Aug. 18, 1989, as amended by Amdt. 91-296, 72 FR 31679, June 7, 2007]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1997–1998 · leading case: Jackson v. United States, 156 F.3d 230 (1st Cir. 1998).
Jackson v. United States, 156 F.3d 230 (1st Cir. 1998). “14 C.F.R. § 91.183 (1998). It is both good law and sound logic that a pilot bears a responsibility to circumvent dangerous weather conditions that are perceptible through his own senses.”
Jackson v. United States, 983 F. Supp. 273 (D. Mass. 1997). “14 C.F.R. § 91.183 . Nothing in the evidence indicates that Jackson did not comply with that obligation.”
Jackson v. United States (1st Cir. 1998). “14 C.F.R. 91.183 (1998). It is both good law and sound logic that a pilot bears a responsibility to circumvent dangerous weather conditions that are perceptible through his own senses.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.