16 C.F.R. § 1201.4

Test procedures

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as provided in §§ 1201.1(c) and (d), architectural glazing products shall be tested in accordance with all of the applicable test provisions of ANSI Z97.1-2015 “American National Standard for Safety Glazing Materials Used in Building—Safety Performance Specifications and Methods of Test,” approved March 2015. The Director of the Federal Register approves the incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy from ANSI Customer Service Department, 25 W. 43rd Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036. You may inspect a copy at the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone 301-504-7923, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

[81 FR 15431, Mar. 23, 2016]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1979–2020 · leading case: O’keeffe’s, Inc., Petitioner, v. U.S. Consum. Prod. Saf. Comm'n, Respondent, 92 F.3d 940 (9th Cir. 1996).
O’keeffe’s, Inc., Petitioner, v. U.S. Consum. Prod. Saf. Comm'n, Respondent, 92 F.3d 940 (9th Cir. 1996). · cites it 2× “16 C.F.R. § 1201.4 (a). The material is set in a frame, and a leather punching bag filled with lead shot is suspended from a string attached to a stand.”
Asg Indus., Inc. v. Consum. Prod. Saf. Comm'n, Flat Glass Ass'n of Japan v. Consum. Prod. Saf. Comm'n, 593 F.2d 1323 (D.C. Cir. 1979). · cites it 2× “See 16 C.F.R. § 1201.4 (e)(1) (1978); 42 Fed.”
Leipart v. Guardian Indus., Inc., 234 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2000). “16 C.F.R. § 1201.4 . The door passes the test if the glass is broken and the resulting hole is smaller than a specified size; if the glass is broken and the ten largest pieces weigh less than a specified amount; or if the glass does not break at all.”
Parker v. Four Seasons Hotels, Ltd. (N.D. Ill. 2018). · cites it 3× “Exclusion of Evidence Related to Federal, State, and Municipal Code Violations Parker argues that it was an error to exclude evidence that Four Seasons violated the Illinois Safety Glazing Materials Act, 430 ILCS 60/3; a federal regulation regarding the testing of safety glazing…”
Diane Parker v. Four Seasons Hotels (7th Cir. 2020). “Finally, Parker argues that Judge Shah unreasonably excluded evidence that Four Seasons (allegedly) violated three laws or regulations: the Illinois Safety Glazing Materials Act, 430 ILCS 60/3, which requires tempered glass to be labeled; a federal regulation controlling the…”
Diane Parker v. Four Seasons Hotels (7th Cir. 2020). “Finally, Parker argues that Judge Shah unreasonably excluded evidence that Four Seasons (allegedly) violated three laws or regulations: the Illinois Safety Glazing Materials Act, 430 ILCS 60/3, which requires tempered glass to be labeled; a federal regulation controlling the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.