16 C.F.R. § 2.12
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1971–1976 · leading case: Gen. Elec. Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 411 F. Supp. 1004 (N.D.N.Y. 1976).
Gen. Elec. Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 411 F. Supp. 1004 (N.D.N.Y. 1976). “On June 27, 1975, the FTC pursuant to its procedures [see 16 C.F.R. § 2.12 ] approved and adopted this final Form EEM and ordered approximately forty-four major electric manufacturers to complete it; this order included the plaintiffs herein, the General Electric Company and the…”
Genuine Parts Co., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, Defendants-Appellees-Cross, 445 F.2d 1382 (5th Cir. 1971). “16 C.F.R. § 2.12 (b), 15 U.S.C.A. (App.Supp.”
Aluminum Co. of Am. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 390 F. Supp. 301 (S.D.N.Y. 1975). “-12(b) of the Commission’s Procedures and Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 2.12 (b). 15 . Tlie Coca-Cola Company, Kraftco Corporation, Armco Steel Corporation, and International Harvester Company.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.