C.F.R. » Title 16 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION › SUBCHAPTER D—TRADE REGULATION RULES › PART 455—USED MOTOR VEHICLE TRADE REGULATION RULE

16 C.F.R. § 455.3

Window form

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Form given to buyer. Give the buyer of a used vehicle sold by you the window form displayed under § 455.2 containing all of the disclosures required by the Rule and reflecting the warranty coverage agreed upon. If you prefer, you may give the buyer a copy of the original, so long as that copy accurately reflects all of the disclosures required by the Rule and the warranty coverage agreed upon.

(b) Incorporated into contract. The information on the final version of the window form is incorporated into the contract of sale for each used vehicle you sell to a consumer. Information on the window form overrides any contrary provisions in the contract of sale. To inform the consumer of these facts, include the following language conspicuously in each consumer contract of sale:

The information you see on the window form for this vehicle is part of this contract. Information on the window form overrides any contrary provisions in the contract of sale.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2024 · leading case: Curtis v. Bill Byrd Auto., Inc., 579 So. 2d 590 (Ala. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Curtis v. Bill Byrd Auto., Inc., 579 So. 2d 590 (Ala. 1991). · cites it 3× “" See 16 C.F.R. § 455.3 , "Window form," attached hereto as Appendix C.”
Martinez v. Prestige Imports, Inc., 2024 IL App (2d) 240121 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “16 C.F.R. § 455.3 (a) (2017). The final warranty terms of any car sale must be “identified in the contract of sale and summarized on the copy of the window form.”
Gallagher v. Wmk Inc., Unpublished Decision (12-12-2007), 2007 Ohio 6615 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). “16 C.F.R. Section 455.3 (b). In this case, the contract did include the mandated language incorporating the "window form" or "Buyer's Guide" into the contract.”
Jones v. N&S Auto Sales, Inc., 2013 Ohio 2468 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “It found the following: (1) On Jones’s first claim for relief, the trial court found that defendants violated 16 C.F.R. 455.3(a), the Used Motor Vehicle Trade Regulation rule, because it found that defendants failed to provide the requisite information on the window form of the…”
— 16 C.F.R. § 455.3(a) — 1 case
Jones v. N&S Auto Sales, Inc., 2013 Ohio 2468 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013). “It found the following: (1) On Jones’s first claim for relief, the trial court found that defendants violated 16 C.F.R. 455.3(a), the Used Motor Vehicle Trade Regulation rule, because it found that defendants failed to provide the requisite information on the window form of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.