C.F.R. » Title 18 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY › SUBCHAPTER B—REGULATIONS UNDER THE FEDERAL POWER ACT › PART 11—ANNUAL CHARGES UNDER PART I OF THE FEDERAL POWER ACT › Subpart C—General Procedures

18 C.F.R. § 11.21

Penalties

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

If any person fails to pay annual charges within the periods specified in § 11.20, a penalty of 5 percent of the total delinquent amount will be assessed and added to the total charges for the first month or part of month in which payment is delinquent. An additional penalty of 3 percent for each full month thereafter will be assessed until the charges and penalties are satisfied in accordance with law. The Commission may, by order, waive any penalty imposed by this subsection, for good cause shown.

[51 FR 24318, July 3, 1986]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1978–1996 · leading case: City of Vanceburg, Kentucky v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, (Two Cases), 571 F.2d 630 (D.C. Cir. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Vanceburg, Kentucky v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, (Two Cases), 571 F.2d 630 (D.C. Cir. 1978). · cites it 2× “These charges are governed by 18 C.F.R. 11.21. 11 . See, e. g., Order Modifying and Adopting Initial Decision of Presiding Examiner and Examiner’s Further Decision Upon Reopened Hearing, The Montana Power Co.”
City of Oswego, New York v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 97 F.3d 1490 (D.C. Cir. 1996). · cites it 2× “The City also sought a waiver of any penalties for late payment of the fee, pursuant to the “good cause” provision in 18 C.F.R. § 11.21 . On September 16, 1992, FERC denied the request for a “without profit” exemption as to the charges for 1991, and denied a waiver of the late…”
The City of Seattle v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 883 F.2d 1084 (D.C. Cir. 1989). “560 amended 18 C.F.R. § 11.21 to establish charges for the use of federal land in hydroelectric projects that more closely approximated its true market value, thus ensuring that the United States was adequately compensated.”
— 18 C.F.R. § 11.21(b) — 1 case
City of Vanceburg, Kentucky v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, (Two Cases), 571 F.2d 630 (D.C. Cir. 1978). “These charges are governed by 18 C.F.R. 11.21. 11 . See, e. g., Order Modifying and Adopting Initial Decision of Presiding Examiner and Examiner’s Further Decision Upon Reopened Hearing, The Montana Power Co.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.