18 C.F.R. § 154.103

Composition of tariff

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The tariff must contain sections, in the following order: A table of contents, a preliminary statement, a uniform resource locator for the Internet address of a map of the system, currently effective rates, composition of rate schedules, general terms and conditions, form of service agreement, and an index of customers.

(b) Rate schedules must be grouped according to class and numbered serially within each group, using letters before the serial number to indicate the class of service. For example: FT-1, FT-2 may be used for firm transportation service; IT-1, IT-2 may be used for interruptible transportation service; X-1, X-2 may be used for schedules for which special exception has been obtained.

[Order 582, 60 FR 52996, Oct. 11, 1995, as amended by Order 801, 79 FR 75050, Dec. 17, 2014]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1987–1991 · leading case: Wagner & Brown v. Anr Pipeline Co., 837 F.2d 199 (5th Cir. 1988).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wagner & Brown v. Anr Pipeline Co., 837 F.2d 199 (5th Cir. 1988). “This meets the requirements of 18 C.F.R. § 154.103 (1987) which states that jurisdictional contracts must contain a five year opportunity period for make-up of take-or-pay payments.”

Diamond Shamrock Expl. Co. v. Hodel, 853 F.2d 1159 (5th Cir. 1988). · cites it 2× “18 C.F.R. § 154.103 (1987). . The refund claims of Exxon and Cities Service pose additional problems which will be treated separately, infra.”

Associated Gas Distributors v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 824 F.2d 981 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “See 18 C.F.R. § 154.103 (mandating that purchase contracts for gas to be transported in interstate commerce carry a minimum five-year make-up period).”

Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 931 F.2d 948 (D.C. Cir. 1991). “18 CFR § 154.103 (1990). In fact, the Commission cheerfully allows rate base treatment for gas prepayments under contracts providing for longer make-up periods.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.